A lady named Charlotte Gulley (who is not anonymous) confronted Dr. Michael Brown about his interview with Bill Johnson. You can read the first exchange here on Are you on Michael Brown’s Naughty or Nice List?
There was more to their discussion. Read the screenshot below:
Notice how Dr. Michael Brown resorted to telling Charlotte Gulley that she didn’t know what she was talking about? Dr. Michael Brown doesn’t know her, as he said in his other twitter exchange with her, so how could he possibly claim that she’s speaking of things she doesn’t know when he doesn’t know her?
What we’ve learned here is that it doesn’t matter if someone confronts Michael Brown anonymously or in person. If you dare to question him in areas he’s not capable of responding to because he knows he can’t biblically defend his heretical positions. Dr. Michael Brown resorted to using an Ad Hominem argument in order to avoid having to deal with the substance of a statement or claim that he didn’t like and/or agree with.
Categories: New Apostolic Reformation (NAR)