A few days ago, Tanya Levin spoke of her experience with Hillsong, the police and her court hearing.
Tanya Levin writes,
This wasn’t a protest for the Vietnam War and this isn’t the ’60’s. There was nothing fantastic about being arrested at the Hillsong conference in Sydney nearly 2 years ago, that year that Justin Bieber brought Hailey Baldwin, My heart still raced to have to tell my parents, supportive as they have been, that this terrible thing had happened. It’s not in the least cool to be arrested in my family, make no mistake about that. We don’t make trouble with the law where I come from, and that’s worked fine for me so far.
I was charged with two counts of trespass or, more technically, entering inclosed grounds. I’ve got the paperwork here with the exact details, but I’m tired right now.
I have the fact sheets from the police, and the notice that banned me from Olympic Park for 6 months, that was handed to me 3 months after its start date. . I have the 150+ pages of transcript from the two and a half days of hearing in the local court. I was found guilty, fined $700, and obtained my first and only criminal record. That was 22/12/2015. I appealed that decision, and this week, in the NSW court, the findings were upheld, but the convictions were dismissed.
To be absolutely clear this is not any episode of CSI. In NSW the police pursue charges. Once those charges were laid, it was not for Hillsong to simply have them dropped. However, I’ll leave it up to you to imagine what would happen if any senior type of pastor had petitioned the court to let this go, instead of sending witnesses to ensure the convictions went through.
There’s a lot of questions that still need to be answered.
What kind of independence do police hold who are working at a particular organisation’s private events?
Were these 2 years worth of court time valuable for noble or philosophical reasons, examining the law, and setting precedents that need setting?
Is Hillsong willing to disclose their ownership of land, premises and surrounding perimeters to me on an international basis so that I know where I can walk in this world without this happening again?
Who else are they having arrested, who doesn’t have any kind of support like that which I have been given, or the chutzpah that I can’t always help.
I don’t have expertise in these areas, but doesn’t anyone else want to know? They’ve punched me smack bang in the chutzpah. I’m a little low on it right now.
It’s clear this was a warning shot. Brian Houston doesn’t like critics and neither do the police. So I’m taking my time and thinking this through.
Here’s something a mate of mine wrote about it. Sums up the outrage I’d have if I weren’t so gosh darn tired right now :)”
Source: Tanya Levin, FaceBook, https://www.facebook.com/ilikelevin/posts/1536047649791167, Published 07/05/2017. (Accessed 09/05/2017.)
Chrys Stevenson from ‘Gladly The Cross-Eyed Bear’ published the following article:
HILLSONG CHURCH VS A WOMAN OF ‘IMPECCABLE CHARACTER’
What kind of bastardry does it take to for a multi-million dollar enterprise (in league with the NSW Police) to pursue a criminal conviction against a single mother for two years over a minor infringement she had no clue she had committed?
What if that single mother’s career – her only source of income – depended on a clean record?
What if the woman’s only crime was standing in a non-ticketed area, on a public concourse, outside a publicly owned convention venue?
Petty? Nasty? A waste of police resources and precious court time? Lacking in common sense? Yes! All of these things. But, what if it’s far worse than that?
What if the organisation intent on destroying the life, career and financial security, (not only of this woman, but her teenage son), was a church? Hillsong Church.
And what if this church, which put a woman through hell for two years for the crime of walking on a public footpath, was closely linked to the state’s commissioner of police? What if the commissioner of police was so closely allied to this church and its leadership, he actually attended the conference where she was arrested?
That’s the position my friend, writer and social worker, Tanya Levin, found herself in over the past two years.
When Hillsong held their annual convention at Olympic Park in Sydney in 2015, the television show, A Current Affair, asked her for an interview outside the convention venue.
Tanya grew up in Hillsong Church. In 2007, her memoir, People in Glass Houses: An Insider’s Story of a Life In and Out of Hillsong, was published to great acclaim and wide publicity. Tanya wrote the book critically, but with no malice. As she transitioned from teenager to adult, Tanya’s religious and political views changed and she became increasingly uneasy about the church’s values, priorities and wealth. But, her book (which I’ve read twice) was not a hatchet job. At worst, it was a fair and balanced account of her personal views on a very public and very wealthy organisation. As Hillsong sued neither Tanya nor the publisher, one can only assume any negative claims made in the book were truthful and not defamatory. Yet, hyper-sensitive to any kind of questioning or criticism, the church slapped Tanya with a life-time ban in 2005 for daring to disagree publicly with church leader, Bobbi Houston.
In her book, Tanya describes how she tried hard to do the right thing by Hillsong. She wrote twice to church leaders, Brian and Bobbi Houston, asking for an interview to get their side of the story, but she was refused. She genuinely didn’t want to be unfair. Tanya went back to the church to observe a service in case things had changed since she was a member of the congregation: the Houstons had her forcibly removed by security!
Eight years later, the Houstons’ wrath had clearly not cooled. As Tanya stood with the television crew, outside the convention venue, on a public concourse, they were approached by police and told they were ‘trespassing’. The claim was that Hillsong had rented both the stadium and the area surrounding it. Despite the concourse area being open to passing members of the public, as an outspoken critic of the church, ‘banned-for-life’ Tanya Levin was not welcome. Tanya and the ACA team complied and moved to another area. In fact, the police record states Tanya ran to comply with their request!
After the interview, Tanya inadvertently stepped back into a space designated as ‘private’ (although there was no barrier, marking or other indication to delineate it). Now, she was beckoned back well inside the ‘perimeter’ by a police officer. She was astonished to be told, as this was her second infringement, she was under arrest.
As Tanya said to me privately, “I’m South African and terrified of the police. It’s weird. If a policeman tells me to move, I move!”
There is absolutely no way she would have trespassed intentionally. Anyone who knows Tanya knows that. The irony is that two people who know Tanya best – who have known her since childhood – are Hillsong’s leaders, Brian and Bobbi Houston.
The police record also notes, ominously, that Tanya was seen ‘speaking to children’. The truth is, after her interview, a 15 year old approached Tanya to ask why she’d been moved on by police. Natural curiosity. Tanya, politely, asked the young lady if she enjoyed attending Hillsong. The girl replied “no”: she was forced to attend by her foster family. She said Brian Houston made disparaging remarks about people suffering from mental illness and it made her uncomfortable because she had ‘mental problems’. That was the extent of the conversation – entirely at the instigation of the young lady. God forbid she should grow up to voice any criticism of the Houstons or their church or she may find herself in the same position as Tanya!
Tanya was removed and interrogated before being allowed to leave. The people at A Current Affair wanted nothing to do with it and gave her no support – certainly, no financial support – to fight the charges.
Tanya was traumatised. And the trauma was dragged out for 2 years as she was forced to find the financial and emotional resources to fight a multi-million dollar organisation and the NSW police in court to prevent being branded a criminal.
At her first hearing, Tanya was found guilty and a criminal conviction was recorded. It was devastating. The decision severely limited her ability to find a job in her chosen profession – as a social worker – or in any other profession for that matter. She was innocent, but did not have the financial resources to fight it. And yet, her only recourse was to appeal.
Tanya’s friends rallied and helped raise some funds for costs. Through her social network, an experienced solicitor and barrister with a distaste for religious bullies offered to represent her pro bono.
Last week, a magistrate decided, while there was no technical error in her previous conviction, Tanya’s ‘impeccable character’ and previously clean criminal record, together with the fact she could not, reasonably, have known she was committing a crime, warranted the conviction being overturned.
Tanya was deemed to be a person of ‘impeccable character’; it is a great deal more than can be said for the church which pursued Tanya out of fear, spite and raw hatred. Ironically, if Brian Houston had emulated the religious figure he exploits to fund his multi-million dollar empire, he would have stepped in to ask for the charges to be withdrawn. Instead, he did nothing. He certainly never stopped to ask himself, “What would Jesus do?”
And what of the police service which aided Hillsong in this ridiculous, costly and unfair persecution? One can only hope now-retired Police Commissioner, Andrew Scipione, a close friend of Brian Houston and his church, was not involved in this tawdry and unjust witch hunt. And what is the relationship between Hillsong and the NSW Police now Scipione is gone? If there is an alliance between Hillsong and the NSW Police, it seems a hell of an unholy one, to me.
Source: Chrys Stevenson, HILLSONG CHURCH VS A WOMAN OF ‘IMPECCABLE CHARACTER’, GLADLY, THE CROSS-EYED BEAR, https://thatsmyphilosophy.wordpress.com/2017/05/07/hillsong-church-vs-a-woman-of-impeccable-character/, Published 07/05/2017. (Accessed 09/05/2017.)